<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 495 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124851</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the lower Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to set aside a demand of Rs. 5,40,511.00 on the Respondents. The lower Appellate Authority&#039;s ruling was upheld due to lack of substantiation by the Revenue, as they failed to provide essential documents and evidence to support their case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of factual evidence and proper substantiation in legal proceedings, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:03:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 495 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124851</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the lower Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to set aside a demand of Rs. 5,40,511.00 on the Respondents. The lower Appellate Authority&#039;s ruling was upheld due to lack of substantiation by the Revenue, as they failed to provide essential documents and evidence to support their case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of factual evidence and proper substantiation in legal proceedings, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>