<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 491 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124847</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 20/2008 (V-II) Cus. dated 31-3-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs &amp;amp; Service Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam-IV. The impugned order found that the appellants were eligible for a refund due to the exemption from CVD and SAD levies on Sulphuric Acid imported for use in the manufacture of fertilizer. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefit as the manufacturer had not passed on the duty burden to the buyers, and the price of the final product (fertilizer) was controlled by the Government, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 491 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124847</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 20/2008 (V-II) Cus. dated 31-3-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs &amp;amp; Service Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam-IV. The impugned order found that the appellants were eligible for a refund due to the exemption from CVD and SAD levies on Sulphuric Acid imported for use in the manufacture of fertilizer. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefit as the manufacturer had not passed on the duty burden to the buyers, and the price of the final product (fertilizer) was controlled by the Government, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>