https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124836 A corrigendum to an order-in-original was treated as a permissible clarification because it only supplied an omitted effective date for the expansion claim, making the original order incomplete without that date. On a prima facie view, the doctrine of functus officio was held inapplicable because the correction did not amount to a fresh adjudication. Since the appellate order would have led to refund and was found not sustainable at that stage, interim protection was granted and operation of the order dated 28-3-2008 was stayed until disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:05:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124836 A corrigendum to an order-in-original was treated as a permissible clarification because it only supplied an omitted effective date for the expansion claim, making the original order incomplete without that date. On a prima facie view, the doctrine of functus officio was held inapplicable because the correction did not amount to a fresh adjudication. Since the appellate order would have led to refund and was found not sustainable at that stage, interim protection was granted and operation of the order dated 28-3-2008 was stayed until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124836