<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 726 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order and reinstating the original order-in-original. The Tribunal emphasized that the appeal was solely against the refund claim rejection, and the Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded authority by ordering re-assessment without proper invocation of relevant provisions. The case focused on the mistaken declaration leading to a refund claim rejection, highlighting the limited scope of appeal against refund claims and the necessity of invoking specific provisions for re-assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 726 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order and reinstating the original order-in-original. The Tribunal emphasized that the appeal was solely against the refund claim rejection, and the Commissioner (Appeals) exceeded authority by ordering re-assessment without proper invocation of relevant provisions. The case focused on the mistaken declaration leading to a refund claim rejection, highlighting the limited scope of appeal against refund claims and the necessity of invoking specific provisions for re-assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>