https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124827 The appeal was allowed for remand to verify the revenue deposit treatment and determine eligibility for refund without unjust enrichment, in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment, directing the appellant to demonstrate that the revenue deposit was not charged to the Profit and Loss Account but treated as recoverable to avoid unjust enrichment. The case was remanded for further verification and orders based on evidence presented, highlighting the importance of complying with statutory provisions and equitable principles in refund claims. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:13:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124827 The appeal was allowed for remand to verify the revenue deposit treatment and determine eligibility for refund without unjust enrichment, in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment, directing the appellant to demonstrate that the revenue deposit was not charged to the Profit and Loss Account but treated as recoverable to avoid unjust enrichment. The case was remanded for further verification and orders based on evidence presented, highlighting the importance of complying with statutory provisions and equitable principles in refund claims. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124827