<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 717 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124820</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed Appeal No. E/1160/2001 related to the rejection of the refund claim for the period 30-9-1998 to 17-10-1998. Appeal No. E/652/2001 concerning the demand of differential duty for the period 28-10-1999 to 27-12-1999 was disposed of with a reduction of penalty to Rs. 5,000. The Tribunal upheld the differential duty demand for the specified period based on the wholesale nature of transactions from the appellant&#039;s depot. The rejection of the refund claim for the earlier period was deemed justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 717 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124820</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed Appeal No. E/1160/2001 related to the rejection of the refund claim for the period 30-9-1998 to 17-10-1998. Appeal No. E/652/2001 concerning the demand of differential duty for the period 28-10-1999 to 27-12-1999 was disposed of with a reduction of penalty to Rs. 5,000. The Tribunal upheld the differential duty demand for the specified period based on the wholesale nature of transactions from the appellant&#039;s depot. The rejection of the refund claim for the earlier period was deemed justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>