https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124815 The appellant's appeal against a fine and penalty for misdeclaration of imported silk was partially successful. The court found no evidence of deliberate misdeclaration to avoid Anti Dumping Duty. While the fine and penalty were deemed excessive, they were imposed in accordance with the law. The court distinguished the case from a similar one cited by the appellant's counsel, emphasizing that penalties should be for deliberate defiance of the law, not technical breaches. The appellant's claim of bonafide belief was supported, and they were entitled to consequential relief. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:57:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124815 The appellant's appeal against a fine and penalty for misdeclaration of imported silk was partially successful. The court found no evidence of deliberate misdeclaration to avoid Anti Dumping Duty. While the fine and penalty were deemed excessive, they were imposed in accordance with the law. The court distinguished the case from a similar one cited by the appellant's counsel, emphasizing that penalties should be for deliberate defiance of the law, not technical breaches. The appellant's claim of bonafide belief was supported, and they were entitled to consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124815