https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124812 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for fresh consideration, setting aside the orders upholding the refund sanctioning and crediting to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The appellant was granted one month to submit evidence to support their claim of no unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and considering the evidence presented. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124812 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for fresh consideration, setting aside the orders upholding the refund sanctioning and crediting to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The appellant was granted one month to submit evidence to support their claim of no unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and considering the evidence presented. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124812