https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124803 A lock-out notice, read with later notices inviting employees to resume work and extending the reporting time, does not necessarily amount to discharge; in the stated facts, employees who reported within time were entitled to return, and limited compensation was maintained. A standing order providing automatic discharge for 14 consecutive days' absence without permission was held to operate even where the workmen were in police custody, since custody did not by itself suspend the employer's discretion over leave. The text also states that industrial tribunals may interfere with dismissal only for mala fides, victimisation, unfair labour practice, breach of natural justice, or a baseless or perverse finding. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jan 2015 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124803 A lock-out notice, read with later notices inviting employees to resume work and extending the reporting time, does not necessarily amount to discharge; in the stated facts, employees who reported within time were entitled to return, and limited compensation was maintained. A standing order providing automatic discharge for 14 consecutive days' absence without permission was held to operate even where the workmen were in police custody, since custody did not by itself suspend the employer's discretion over leave. The text also states that industrial tribunals may interfere with dismissal only for mala fides, victimisation, unfair labour practice, breach of natural justice, or a baseless or perverse finding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124803