<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 699 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a bank guarantee of Rs. 3.00 lakhs for the imported Bentley car, allowing provisional release within three days. The decision considered the previous import of the same model by the dealer and the personal use nature of the current import, emphasizing the need for detailed analysis of classification provisions despite precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 699 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a bank guarantee of Rs. 3.00 lakhs for the imported Bentley car, allowing provisional release within three days. The decision considered the previous import of the same model by the dealer and the personal use nature of the current import, emphasizing the need for detailed analysis of classification provisions despite precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>