<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 698 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, holding that they were not liable to pay an amount equal to 10% under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The applicants were found entitled to credit for duty paid on inputs used in exempted goods cleared for export and were granted a waiver of the pre-deposit of demanded amounts. Recovery was stayed pending the appeal&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 698 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, holding that they were not liable to pay an amount equal to 10% under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The applicants were found entitled to credit for duty paid on inputs used in exempted goods cleared for export and were granted a waiver of the pre-deposit of demanded amounts. Recovery was stayed pending the appeal&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>