<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, from Rs. 6,18,944 to Rs. 5000. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner&#039;s reasoning that the penalty amount was not justified as the respondent promptly rectified the error in availing Cenvat credit upon discovery. The Tribunal found no defects in the Commissioner&#039;s order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:03:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, from Rs. 6,18,944 to Rs. 5000. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner&#039;s reasoning that the penalty amount was not justified as the respondent promptly rectified the error in availing Cenvat credit upon discovery. The Tribunal found no defects in the Commissioner&#039;s order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>