https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124790 The appeal involved the confiscation of baby receiving fabric by the Department under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The fabric, in a semi-finished state, was not removed by the appellants, thus Rule 25 was deemed inapplicable. Consequently, the confiscation and penalty were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:59:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124790 The appeal involved the confiscation of baby receiving fabric by the Department under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The fabric, in a semi-finished state, was not removed by the appellants, thus Rule 25 was deemed inapplicable. Consequently, the confiscation and penalty were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124790