<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 688 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the appellant in a case involving the identification of the supplier of smuggled gold. The appellant successfully argued mistaken identity, pointing out inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of verification by the Department regarding the alleged connections. Insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the confiscated gold led to the unjustified penalty being overturned, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 688 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the appellant in a case involving the identification of the supplier of smuggled gold. The appellant successfully argued mistaken identity, pointing out inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of verification by the Department regarding the alleged connections. Insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the confiscated gold led to the unjustified penalty being overturned, with the Tribunal finding in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>