https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124781 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant as the demand for excise duty was deemed time-barred due to historical compliance with revenue instructions and lack of intentional suppression. The appellant's argument was supported by the Tribunal, which found that the allegation of suppression with intent to evade payment of duty was not sustainable, leading to the demand being set aside on the same basis. en-us Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:28:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124781 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant as the demand for excise duty was deemed time-barred due to historical compliance with revenue instructions and lack of intentional suppression. The appellant's argument was supported by the Tribunal, which found that the allegation of suppression with intent to evade payment of duty was not sustainable, leading to the demand being set aside on the same basis. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124781