<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 683 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Revenue to grant the appellant a post-decisional hearing promptly, within one month, to reassess the need for the suspension. Emphasizing the importance of concluding the inquiry swiftly, a three-month deadline was set for the completion of the enquiry proceedings. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aimed to balance the necessity of immediate action with procedural fairness, ensuring a timely resolution of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 683 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Revenue to grant the appellant a post-decisional hearing promptly, within one month, to reassess the need for the suspension. Emphasizing the importance of concluding the inquiry swiftly, a three-month deadline was set for the completion of the enquiry proceedings. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aimed to balance the necessity of immediate action with procedural fairness, ensuring a timely resolution of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>