https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124758 The appeals stemmed from a case involving duty evasion by a manufacturing company and the liability of its director. The director admitted to the duty evasion, leading to penalty imposition. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially set aside the penalties, but upon review, it was determined that penalties were warranted under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The penalties were reduced from the original amounts, with the company and director facing penalties of Rs. 78,000/- and Rs. 20,000/-, respectively, based on their involvement in the duty evasion. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:33:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124758 The appeals stemmed from a case involving duty evasion by a manufacturing company and the liability of its director. The director admitted to the duty evasion, leading to penalty imposition. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially set aside the penalties, but upon review, it was determined that penalties were warranted under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The penalties were reduced from the original amounts, with the company and director facing penalties of Rs. 78,000/- and Rs. 20,000/-, respectively, based on their involvement in the duty evasion. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124758