<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 817 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124738</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeal by the party against the Commissioner&#039;s Order, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal for a mandatory penalty imposition. The judgment resolved the duty demand issue on the assembly and sale of computers without concrete evidence of manufacturing activity. The lack of reliable evidence supporting the presumption of computer assembly led to ruling in favor of the party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:50:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 817 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124738</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeal by the party against the Commissioner&#039;s Order, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal for a mandatory penalty imposition. The judgment resolved the duty demand issue on the assembly and sale of computers without concrete evidence of manufacturing activity. The lack of reliable evidence supporting the presumption of computer assembly led to ruling in favor of the party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>