<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 593 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124719</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, granted relief to the appellant by allowing the stay petition unconditionally. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not be held responsible for the misplacement of documents by the Revenue, crucial for their defense, and thus should not be subjected to duty liability. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing access to seized documents to ensure a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 593 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124719</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, granted relief to the appellant by allowing the stay petition unconditionally. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not be held responsible for the misplacement of documents by the Revenue, crucial for their defense, and thus should not be subjected to duty liability. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing access to seized documents to ensure a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>