<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 550 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124697</link>
    <description>The court confirmed a duty and penalty under Sec. 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the appellant for not paying duty on yeast. The appellant&#039;s argument that no MRP was required for their product under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 was upheld. The court emphasized respecting decisions of authorities under specific Acts and granted a stay, setting aside duty, interest, and penalty pre-deposit requirements. The revenue&#039;s claim for applying Sec. 4A was deemed invalid at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:24:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 550 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124697</link>
      <description>The court confirmed a duty and penalty under Sec. 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the appellant for not paying duty on yeast. The appellant&#039;s argument that no MRP was required for their product under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 was upheld. The court emphasized respecting decisions of authorities under specific Acts and granted a stay, setting aside duty, interest, and penalty pre-deposit requirements. The revenue&#039;s claim for applying Sec. 4A was deemed invalid at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>