https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124687 The Tribunal set aside the selection process for two Judicial Member posts in CESTAT due to non-consideration of the second Respondent. The Applicant, selected for one post, was not party to the previous OA challenging the process. The Tribunal's order was challenged to complete the appointment as per original selection, considering the second Respondent for the remaining vacancy. The Tribunal allowed a fresh selection process, including all eligible candidates, and directed a new interview for one post, determining seniority based on performance. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:19:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124687 The Tribunal set aside the selection process for two Judicial Member posts in CESTAT due to non-consideration of the second Respondent. The Applicant, selected for one post, was not party to the previous OA challenging the process. The Tribunal's order was challenged to complete the appointment as per original selection, considering the second Respondent for the remaining vacancy. The Tribunal allowed a fresh selection process, including all eligible candidates, and directed a new interview for one post, determining seniority based on performance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124687