<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 678 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to restore the appeal that was dismissed for non-compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s failure to predeposit the penalty amount led to the dismissal, with the Department subsequently recovering the dues. Despite missing records, the Tribunal opted to restore the appeal for the interest of justice, instructing the Registry and appellant to reconstruct the records promptly. Further proceedings were scheduled before the Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 678 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to restore the appeal that was dismissed for non-compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s failure to predeposit the penalty amount led to the dismissal, with the Department subsequently recovering the dues. Despite missing records, the Tribunal opted to restore the appeal for the interest of justice, instructing the Registry and appellant to reconstruct the records promptly. Further proceedings were scheduled before the Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>