<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 677 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124669</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit denial was questioned where alleged input shortages were compared with weighment slips, and the Tribunal noted conflicting decisions on that point. The matter was not decided on the merits; instead, the conflict was directed to be placed before the appropriate Division Bench for reference to a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 677 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124669</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit denial was questioned where alleged input shortages were compared with weighment slips, and the Tribunal noted conflicting decisions on that point. The matter was not decided on the merits; instead, the conflict was directed to be placed before the appropriate Division Bench for reference to a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>