<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 673 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for expunction of remarks made by the Tribunal, agreed with the Revenue on the classification and duty liability of processed tyre cord, and sided with the party on the non-liability of duty on scrap tyre cord splicing. The detailed analysis and adherence to legal precedents ensured a thorough resolution of the disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 673 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for expunction of remarks made by the Tribunal, agreed with the Revenue on the classification and duty liability of processed tyre cord, and sided with the party on the non-liability of duty on scrap tyre cord splicing. The detailed analysis and adherence to legal precedents ensured a thorough resolution of the disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>