https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124664 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of duty demand for Polyester waste during Dec. 1994 to Feb. 1995 due to lack of specifics in the notice. It remanded the case to verify duty payment on waste generated and cleared post-March 1995. The remand was justified despite an amendment to Sec. 35A. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal on dropping proceedings for Dec. 1994 to Feb. 1995. The assessee's Cross objection was dismissed as mere commentary on the Revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:55:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124664 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of duty demand for Polyester waste during Dec. 1994 to Feb. 1995 due to lack of specifics in the notice. It remanded the case to verify duty payment on waste generated and cleared post-March 1995. The remand was justified despite an amendment to Sec. 35A. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal on dropping proceedings for Dec. 1994 to Feb. 1995. The assessee's Cross objection was dismissed as mere commentary on the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124664