<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 686 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand, penalty, and confiscation of cotton cone yarn against the appellants for clandestine removal. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was maintained, with the penalty amount reduced to Rs. 50,000. The plea for leniency based on financial hardships was considered but deemed irrelevant at the final hearing stage. The impugned order was sustained, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:08:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 686 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand, penalty, and confiscation of cotton cone yarn against the appellants for clandestine removal. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was maintained, with the penalty amount reduced to Rs. 50,000. The plea for leniency based on financial hardships was considered but deemed irrelevant at the final hearing stage. The impugned order was sustained, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>