https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124654 The tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, finding merit in classifying Branded Chewing Tobacco under sub-heading 2403 99 10 instead of 2403 99 30 as contended by the revenue. The tribunal noted the absence of the term "Chewing" in the entry for Zarda Scented Tobacco, supporting the applicant's classification. Consequently, the tribunal waived the pre-deposit of duty and penalties, staying the recovery pending appeal, which was set for regular hearing. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:04:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124654 The tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, finding merit in classifying Branded Chewing Tobacco under sub-heading 2403 99 10 instead of 2403 99 30 as contended by the revenue. The tribunal noted the absence of the term "Chewing" in the entry for Zarda Scented Tobacco, supporting the applicant's classification. Consequently, the tribunal waived the pre-deposit of duty and penalties, staying the recovery pending appeal, which was set for regular hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124654