<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 683 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124652</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was found where the appellants had already paid part of the demand and relied on Board Circular No. 71/71/94-CX dated 27-10-1994. The circular recognised that small scale industry exemption cannot be denied merely because the goods bear a brand name that has no significance to the buyer. On that basis, stay of recovery was granted in respect of the duty demand and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:44:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 683 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124652</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was found where the appellants had already paid part of the demand and relied on Board Circular No. 71/71/94-CX dated 27-10-1994. The circular recognised that small scale industry exemption cannot be denied merely because the goods bear a brand name that has no significance to the buyer. On that basis, stay of recovery was granted in respect of the duty demand and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>