<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 669 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition on the appellant for his involvement in fabricating and selling forged advance licenses without payment of custom duty. The appellant&#039;s defense of lack of awareness was dismissed as both he and an accomplice admitted to the fraudulent activities. The Tribunal found consistency in their statements and affirmed the penalties, emphasizing the seriousness of customs compliance and accountability in revenue matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 669 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition on the appellant for his involvement in fabricating and selling forged advance licenses without payment of custom duty. The appellant&#039;s defense of lack of awareness was dismissed as both he and an accomplice admitted to the fraudulent activities. The Tribunal found consistency in their statements and affirmed the penalties, emphasizing the seriousness of customs compliance and accountability in revenue matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>