<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 787 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124619</link>
    <description>Cutting and slitting of HR/CR coils had already been treated as not amounting to manufacture, and the scrap generated from that process was therefore treated as prima facie not excisable. On that basis, the benefit of Notification No. 89/95-C.E. was found to support the applicant&#039;s request for interim relief, and pre-deposit was waived with recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 787 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124619</link>
      <description>Cutting and slitting of HR/CR coils had already been treated as not amounting to manufacture, and the scrap generated from that process was therefore treated as prima facie not excisable. On that basis, the benefit of Notification No. 89/95-C.E. was found to support the applicant&#039;s request for interim relief, and pre-deposit was waived with recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>