https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124615 In stay proceedings concerning exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E., the tribunal found a prima facie case that an earlier decision under a different notification could not be applied mechanically because the wording had changed. It also noted that the cited ruling on denial of Cenvat credit did not directly govern denial of exemption under this notification. On that basis, pre-deposit of the adjudged dues was waived and recovery of the demand was stayed until disposal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:36:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124615 In stay proceedings concerning exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E., the tribunal found a prima facie case that an earlier decision under a different notification could not be applied mechanically because the wording had changed. It also noted that the cited ruling on denial of Cenvat credit did not directly govern denial of exemption under this notification. On that basis, pre-deposit of the adjudged dues was waived and recovery of the demand was stayed until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124615