<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 778 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the appeal regarding a refund claim for excess duty paid on import of a Circular Knitting Machine. The Appellant failed to prove that the duty incidence had not been passed on to any other person, as discrepancies were found in the treatment of the excess amount in the books of account. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of demonstrating non-passing on duty incidence in such refund claims, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 778 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the appeal regarding a refund claim for excess duty paid on import of a Circular Knitting Machine. The Appellant failed to prove that the duty incidence had not been passed on to any other person, as discrepancies were found in the treatment of the excess amount in the books of account. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of demonstrating non-passing on duty incidence in such refund claims, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>