<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 775 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124607</link>
    <description>Observations by an appellate authority on appropriation of sale proceeds and the rights of creditors were unnecessary where those matters were outside the scope of the appeal. The Tribunal held that issues not forming part of the controversy before it did not require examination, and that findings on matters beyond the record were unwarranted. The impugned observations were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 775 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124607</link>
      <description>Observations by an appellate authority on appropriation of sale proceeds and the rights of creditors were unnecessary where those matters were outside the scope of the appeal. The Tribunal held that issues not forming part of the controversy before it did not require examination, and that findings on matters beyond the record were unwarranted. The impugned observations were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>