<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1016 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124605</link>
    <description>Paper cess, though described as a cess under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, was treated as a duty of excise in law because it was levied and collected as such by the Department of Revenue. On that basis, it formed part of the aggregate duties of excise for computing education cess. The challenge to its inclusion failed, and the base for education cess was held to cover such levies when they are legally duties of excise and are collected accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1016 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124605</link>
      <description>Paper cess, though described as a cess under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, was treated as a duty of excise in law because it was levied and collected as such by the Department of Revenue. On that basis, it formed part of the aggregate duties of excise for computing education cess. The challenge to its inclusion failed, and the base for education cess was held to cover such levies when they are legally duties of excise and are collected accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>