https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124601 The Judge upheld the setting aside of the demand of duty of Rs. 17,760 by the Commissioner (Appeals) and set aside the penalty under Section 11AC. However, the penalty under Rule 25 was upheld for the violation of rules. The Revenue's appeal for enhancement of penalties was rejected, and the assessee's appeal for setting aside the penalty was disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:36:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124601 The Judge upheld the setting aside of the demand of duty of Rs. 17,760 by the Commissioner (Appeals) and set aside the penalty under Section 11AC. However, the penalty under Rule 25 was upheld for the violation of rules. The Revenue's appeal for enhancement of penalties was rejected, and the assessee's appeal for setting aside the penalty was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124601