<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 514 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124597</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeal in a case concerning the calculation of differential duty for goods cleared to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The Tribunal departed from the strict application of FOB prices to DTA sales, emphasizing the importance of evidence and a case-specific assessment. By considering recent precedents and the lack of proof of price manipulation, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, signaling a shift in the valuation methodology for DTA transactions compared to exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 514 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124597</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeal in a case concerning the calculation of differential duty for goods cleared to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The Tribunal departed from the strict application of FOB prices to DTA sales, emphasizing the importance of evidence and a case-specific assessment. By considering recent precedents and the lack of proof of price manipulation, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, signaling a shift in the valuation methodology for DTA transactions compared to exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>