<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 504 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, ruling in favor of the appellants due to the lack of justification for confiscation based on the presence of a small quantity of re-rollable scrap and the timing of the pre-shipment inspection requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 504 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, ruling in favor of the appellants due to the lack of justification for confiscation based on the presence of a small quantity of re-rollable scrap and the timing of the pre-shipment inspection requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>