<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 589 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124578</link>
    <description>An application for restoration of appeals dismissed for non-prosecution will fail where hearing notices and dismissal orders were sent to the address for service recorded in the appeal memorandum and no change of address was intimated to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that a party claiming non-receipt must act prudently by updating its service address after shifting premises; absent such communication, the plea of non-receipt can be treated as a misrepresentation. As no sufficient ground for restoration was shown, the restoration applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 589 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124578</link>
      <description>An application for restoration of appeals dismissed for non-prosecution will fail where hearing notices and dismissal orders were sent to the address for service recorded in the appeal memorandum and no change of address was intimated to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that a party claiming non-receipt must act prudently by updating its service address after shifting premises; absent such communication, the plea of non-receipt can be treated as a misrepresentation. As no sufficient ground for restoration was shown, the restoration applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>