<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 648 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application for condonation of delay, Stay Petition, and Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to provide a valid reason for the delay in filing the appeal, despite being aware of the order since December 2006. The Tribunal found that the delay was not adequately explained, leading to the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s claims and the dismissal of all related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 648 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application for condonation of delay, Stay Petition, and Appeal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to provide a valid reason for the delay in filing the appeal, despite being aware of the order since December 2006. The Tribunal found that the delay was not adequately explained, leading to the rejection of the Appellant&#039;s claims and the dismissal of all related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>