<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 639 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124561</link>
    <description>The appellant, a 100% EOU, faced proceedings for a shortage of finished products. The impugned order confirmed Central Excise duty demands but reduced the penalty to 25%. Customs duty confirmation was overturned as Central Excise duty was paid, rendering the Customs duty and penalty unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the confirmed Customs duty and penalties, disposing of all appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 639 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124561</link>
      <description>The appellant, a 100% EOU, faced proceedings for a shortage of finished products. The impugned order confirmed Central Excise duty demands but reduced the penalty to 25%. Customs duty confirmation was overturned as Central Excise duty was paid, rendering the Customs duty and penalty unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the confirmed Customs duty and penalties, disposing of all appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>