<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 796 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124545</link>
    <description>Penalty was not leviable for issuing further Cenvat credit on goods received under a manufacturer&#039;s invoice, because that invoice was treated as a valid document for first stage dealer invoicing and no statutory requirement compelled the customer to obtain registration for the transaction. The Board circulars relied on in the earlier identical matter supported the same view, and the same legal basis led to penalty being set aside. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, as no contravention attracting penalty was established on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 796 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124545</link>
      <description>Penalty was not leviable for issuing further Cenvat credit on goods received under a manufacturer&#039;s invoice, because that invoice was treated as a valid document for first stage dealer invoicing and no statutory requirement compelled the customer to obtain registration for the transaction. The Board circulars relied on in the earlier identical matter supported the same view, and the same legal basis led to penalty being set aside. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, as no contravention attracting penalty was established on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>