https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124537 The Tribunal set aside the demand raised for the month of April 2000 in a case involving permission for renovation of stenter machines under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The appellant's argument that a typographical error in a letter should not be the sole basis for the Revenue's conclusion was accepted. The Tribunal emphasized that the sealing of the stenter machine supported the conversion claim, and relying solely on a typographical mistake was unjustifiable. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was granted with relief to the appellant. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:30:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124537 The Tribunal set aside the demand raised for the month of April 2000 in a case involving permission for renovation of stenter machines under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The appellant's argument that a typographical error in a letter should not be the sole basis for the Revenue's conclusion was accepted. The Tribunal emphasized that the sealing of the stenter machine supported the conversion claim, and relying solely on a typographical mistake was unjustifiable. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was granted with relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124537