https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124534 The Tribunal modified the stay order unconditionally, considering the appellant's inability to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs due to their assets being possessed by Bank of Maharashtra. An early hearing date of 22-10-2007 was set due to the significant revenue involved. The Bank's possession of the appellant's assets under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, led to the modification of the stay order, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:11:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124534 The Tribunal modified the stay order unconditionally, considering the appellant's inability to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs due to their assets being possessed by Bank of Maharashtra. An early hearing date of 22-10-2007 was set due to the significant revenue involved. The Bank's possession of the appellant's assets under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, led to the modification of the stay order, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124534