https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124511 SC held that the test of "sufficient cause" for condonation under Section 5 is individualistic and discretionary; no fixed categories exist and prosecution of a review application cannot be universally ruled out as insufficient. In exercising Article 136 discretion the Court may be guided by appellate principles but is not bound by them. On the facts, the review was filed within time and the HC re-examined the matter after notice to the respondent, so delay was condoned and the matter was directed to be listed for admission along with the pending IA. en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124511 SC held that the test of "sufficient cause" for condonation under Section 5 is individualistic and discretionary; no fixed categories exist and prosecution of a review application cannot be universally ruled out as insufficient. In exercising Article 136 discretion the Court may be guided by appellate principles but is not bound by them. On the facts, the review was filed within time and the HC re-examined the matter after notice to the respondent, so delay was condoned and the matter was directed to be listed for admission along with the pending IA. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124511