<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 477 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124505</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the penalty below 25% of the duty amount paid by the respondents, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions. The Tribunal held that the penalty reduction was incorrect, reinstated the original penalty amount, and ruled in favor of the Revenue. This case underscores the importance of complying with legal requirements and prescribed penalty amounts under Section 11AC in excise-related matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 477 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124505</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the penalty below 25% of the duty amount paid by the respondents, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions. The Tribunal held that the penalty reduction was incorrect, reinstated the original penalty amount, and ruled in favor of the Revenue. This case underscores the importance of complying with legal requirements and prescribed penalty amounts under Section 11AC in excise-related matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>