<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124504</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for remand, emphasizing a review of the duty quantum and interest rate, with the appellant&#039;s participation in the process. The Tribunal directed reconsideration of the duty amount and interest rate, as these aspects were not addressed by the Commissioner due to the focus on remission eligibility. The appellant will have an opportunity to present their case before a fresh decision is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:09:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124504</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for remand, emphasizing a review of the duty quantum and interest rate, with the appellant&#039;s participation in the process. The Tribunal directed reconsideration of the duty amount and interest rate, as these aspects were not addressed by the Commissioner due to the focus on remission eligibility. The appellant will have an opportunity to present their case before a fresh decision is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>