<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 472 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124500</link>
    <description>An apparent mistake in the earlier CESTAT order was corrected through rectification, and the mistaken observation was deleted. The matter also addressed case management after a Larger Bench decision, with both appeals directed to be listed together once that decision is available. The document records the rectification of the error and the procedural direction for joint hearing of the appeals, without adding any further substantive determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 472 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124500</link>
      <description>An apparent mistake in the earlier CESTAT order was corrected through rectification, and the mistaken observation was deleted. The matter also addressed case management after a Larger Bench decision, with both appeals directed to be listed together once that decision is available. The document records the rectification of the error and the procedural direction for joint hearing of the appeals, without adding any further substantive determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>