<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand but reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 4,25,000 to Rs. 1,50,000 and the penalty from Rs. 80,000 to Rs. 50,000, considering the value of the goods and duty evasion amount. The judgment emphasized the gravity of misdeclaration, imposing appropriate penalties while granting leniency in the fine and penalty amounts due to the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand but reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 4,25,000 to Rs. 1,50,000 and the penalty from Rs. 80,000 to Rs. 50,000, considering the value of the goods and duty evasion amount. The judgment emphasized the gravity of misdeclaration, imposing appropriate penalties while granting leniency in the fine and penalty amounts due to the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>