<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 463 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124491</link>
    <description>Evaporator boats used in manufacturing BOPP films were treated as machinery or equipment classifiable under Heading 84.19, because they were used to evaporate or vaporize aluminium for metallization. Although they were not inputs, they fell within the definition of capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. On that basis, Cenvat credit was held admissible as capital goods, and the Department&#039;s challenge did not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 463 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124491</link>
      <description>Evaporator boats used in manufacturing BOPP films were treated as machinery or equipment classifiable under Heading 84.19, because they were used to evaporate or vaporize aluminium for metallization. Although they were not inputs, they fell within the definition of capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. On that basis, Cenvat credit was held admissible as capital goods, and the Department&#039;s challenge did not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>