https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124484 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the detention order, stating no demand was confirmed against the appellant. The Commissioner (Appeals) found the appeal not maintainable as it was against the detention order. The Tribunal denied the stay petition, proceeding to decide the appeal itself. The goods were provisionally released after the detention was converted into a seizure. The Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal held the detention order was not appealable during ongoing investigations, emphasizing the authorities' power to continue investigations without interference. The appeals were rejected, highlighting the importance of due process and limited interference in initial inquiry stages. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:43:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124484 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the detention order, stating no demand was confirmed against the appellant. The Commissioner (Appeals) found the appeal not maintainable as it was against the detention order. The Tribunal denied the stay petition, proceeding to decide the appeal itself. The goods were provisionally released after the detention was converted into a seizure. The Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal held the detention order was not appealable during ongoing investigations, emphasizing the authorities' power to continue investigations without interference. The appeals were rejected, highlighting the importance of due process and limited interference in initial inquiry stages. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124484